This guide focuses on disposable vape trends most relevant to U.S. users in 2026, with cross-market data used to reflect widely available products and real-world usage behavior.
Core Recommendation Snapshot (Market-Validated)
This table highlights disposable vape brands and product series that show clear market validation heading into 2026.
The selections below are based on publicly available search demand data from Google Trends (EU-US-focused, 2023–2025), keyword trend analysis from SEMrush, and aggregated user feedback patterns observed on platforms such as Reddit and Trustpilot.
Core Recommendation Snapshot
| Brand | Representative Models | Search Demand Signal (EU & US) | Aggregated User Feedback Pattern | Common Usage Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elf Bar | BC5000 / Pi7000 | High and stable global search demand over multiple years | Large review volume confirms predictable and familiar performance | Often used as a performance baseline in disposable vape comparisons |
| Geek Bar | Pulse / Pulse X | Year-over-year growth driven by newer model launches | Users emphasize airflow control and output consistency | Suitable for higher puff usage with regulated delivery |
| Vapsolo | Quads / Triple / Twins | Steady search growth into 2026, especially across U.S. and European | Users frequently mention multi-flavor switching and stable taste consistency | Multi-flavor formats reduce flavor fatigue during long-term use |
| OXBAR | Magic Maze / G8000 | Product searches gaining traction alongside feature-focused devices | Feedback reflects interest in feature variety and novelty | Chosen by users exploring new form factors and functions |
| Lost Mary | OS5000 Series | Strong product-level search interest across multiple regions | Feedback often highlights smooth flavor delivery compared with peers | Favored by users who prioritize flavor smoothness |
| SKE Crystal | Crystal Bar | High visibility in UK-focused search trends | Reviews commonly mention draw feel and compact form factor | Simple option for casual or occasional disposable users |
| ZOVOO | Dragbar Series | Consistent interest across multiple international markets | Feedback notes stable design language and predictable output | Appeals to users seeking reliability over experimentation |
| VOZOL | Gear / Neon Series | Rising product-level search interest during 2025–2026 | Users frequently mention bold design and strong flavor delivery | Selected by users drawn to modern styling and intense flavor |
| JNR | Falcon / Falcon X Series | Growing brand visibility in U.S. and European | Feedback highlights high puff capacity with stable output | Chosen by users prioritizing extended usage duration |
| RAZ | TN9000 / DC25000 | Brand and model searches increased notably in 2025–2026 | Community discussions focus on lifespan realism in high-puff devices | Commonly cited in high-puff disposable vape comparisons |
Overall, the most consistently selected disposable vapes in 2026 are not defined by a single feature such as puff count, but by stable output, predictable performance, and alignment with specific usage habits.
How to Read This List
- Market Signal reflects search interest trends, not brand claims or promotions.
- User Feedback summarizes repeating patterns from Reddit discussions and Trustpilot reviews, not individual opinions.
- Why It’s Worth Trying explains what usage need users commonly choose the product for, not whether it is universally “the best.”
This list is designed to narrow realistic, market-tested options, not to declare a single winner.
The snapshot above highlights which disposable vape brands consistently appear in real market usage.
To understand why these options perform reliably, it is necessary to examine the functional parameters that influence day-to-day stability and user satisfaction.
Disposable Vape Parameter Comparison Snapshot (2026)
This table focuses on functional characteristics that most directly affect real-world usage and device longevity, rather than marketing claims.
| Brand | Model Series | Typical Puff Range | Battery Capacity | Rechargeable | Coil Configuration | Flavor System | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elf Bar | BC5000 / Pi7000 | 5,000–3,0000 | 500–650 mAh | Limited / Model-dependent | Mesh | Single flavor | Users wanting familiar, predictable performance |
| Geek Bar | Pulse / Pulse X | 15,000–25,000 | 650–850 mAh | Yes | Dual Mesh | Single flavor | Users prioritizing airflow control and vapor stability |
| Vapsolo | Quads / Triple / Twins | 40,000–80,000 | 650–900 mAh | Yes | Mesh / Multi-core | Multi-flavor switching | Long-term users seeking flavor variety without fatigue |
| OXBAR | Magic Maze / G8000 | 8,000–15,000 | 600–800 mAh | Yes | Mesh | Feature-driven variants | Users interested in new functions and form factors |
| Lost Mary | OS5000 Series | 5,000–3,0000 | ~500 mAh | Yes | Mesh | Single flavor | Flavor-focused users preferring smooth delivery |
| SKE Crystal | Crystal Bar | 4,000–6,000 | ~500 mAh | No | Standard / Mesh | Single flavor | Casual or occasional disposable users |
| ZOVOO | Dragbar Series | 7,500–15,000 | 600–800 mAh | Yes | Mesh | Single flavor | Users seeking consistent output across models |
| VOZOL | Gear / Neon Series | 10,000–25,000 | 650–900 mAh | Yes | Mesh / Advanced mesh | Single flavor | Users drawn to strong flavor intensity and modern design |
| JNR | Falcon / Falcon X Series | 18,000–30,000 | 850–950 mAh | Yes | Dual Mesh | Single flavor | Heavy users prioritizing extended usage duration |
| RAZ | TN9000 / DC25000 | 9,000–25,000 | 650–900 mAh | Yes | Mesh | Single flavor | Users comparing high-puff lifespan realism |
How These Parameters Were Evaluated
The parameters in this comparison focus on real-world usage stability rather than advertised maximum figures.
Puff ranges reflect typical performance observed in daily use.
Battery capacity and rechargeability are evaluated based on their impact on output consistency over time.
Coil configuration and flavor systems are included because they directly affect flavor retention and vapor stability during extended use.
Data Notes: How the Market Signals Were Evaluated
To ensure transparency and reproducibility, all market signals and user feedback referenced in this article are based on the following data sources and evaluation methods:
- Search demand data is derived from SEMrush brand- and product-level keyword estimates, using global and Eu&Usropean databases where applicable. Search volume ranges and growth trends reflect aggregated estimates rather than exact figures.
- Google Trends analysis is based on relative interest indices (0–100) over extended time periods, focusing on sustained attention rather than short-term spikes. Reported ranges indicate typical interest levels observed heading into 2026.
- User feedback signals are aggregated from large-scale discussion and review platforms, primarily Reddit and Trustpilot. Emphasis is placed on repeating discussion patterns and review volume rather than isolated opinions.
- Review metrics (ratings and review counts) reflect publicly available brand-level snapshots at the time of analysis and may change as new reviews are submitted.
Data reference period:
Most data points referenced in this article were collected and reviewed between Q4 2025 and early 2026, ensuring relevance to current market conditions.
This approach prioritizes consistency, repeatability, and real-world user behavior over editorial judgment or promotional claims.
Why These Products Are Recommended
Methodology & Data Sources
This analysis focuses on trends relevant to both U.S. and European users, with supporting data from publicly available search demand and user feedback patterns. While some metrics reflect European search behavior, the usage insights align with shared product ecosystems and performance preferences seen in the U.S. market as well.
The products listed in the Best Disposable Vape 2026 snapshot are not selected based on editorial preference or brand positioning.
They are identified through a consistent, evidence-based evaluation process designed to reflect how the market actually behaves.
Our goal is simple:
to highlight disposable vape options that show verifiable demand, repeatable user feedback, and product characteristics that matter in real-world use.
Market Interest Signals (Search Demand)
We start by analyzing search demand trends, which indicate what users are actively looking for over time.
Using tools such as SEMrush and Google Trends, we observe:
- Brand-level and product-level search interest
- Long-term trend stability rather than short-term spikes
- Whether interest is sustained across multiple months and regions
Products included in this list consistently show ongoing user interest heading into 2026, rather than brief visibility driven by promotions or releases.
Search demand alone does not define quality, but it does confirm real market attention.
Aggregated User Feedback (Independent Platforms)
Search interest is validated further through large-scale user feedback from independent platforms.
We focus on platforms where users discuss products freely and at scale, including:
- Reddit, where repeated usage experiences, comparisons, and long-term impressions are shared
- Trustpilot, where brand-level ratings and review volume reveal broader user sentiment
Rather than relying on individual opinions, we look for repeating patterns, such as:
- Consistent praise or criticism across many users
- Commonly reported strengths or limitations
- Issues that appear repeatedly over time
This aggregated approach helps reduce bias and highlights collective user experience, not isolated reviews.
Data Sources and Evaluation Scope
Search demand signals referenced in this article are derived from publicly available Google Trends data, with a primary focus on U.S. and European markets between 2023 and 2025, as well as keyword trend observations from SEMrush.
User feedback patterns are summarized from recurring discussions and reviews found on platforms such as Reddit and Trustpilot. These insights represent aggregated behavioral trends rather than individual opinions.
Although some search demand data is derived from U.S. and European datasets, the evaluated device categories and usage patterns closely mirror those observed in the U.S. market due to shared product platforms, global brand availability, and similar consumer expectations around performance.
All data points are used to identify relative market signals and usage patterns, not to represent exact sales volumes or brand-provided performance claims.
Product-Level Characteristics That Affect Real Use
Finally, we evaluate whether product features actually influence real-world usability, not just specifications.
Our focus is on characteristics that users repeatedly mention as meaningful, including:
- Flavor stability across the usage cycle
- Consistency of vapor output and draw
- How design choices (such as multi-flavor configurations) affect long-term satisfaction
Features are not scored based on novelty.
They are considered relevant only when they address a real usage problem, such as flavor fatigue or declining performance over time.
Why This Method Is More Trustworthy
As the disposable vape market continues to mature, rankings based purely on editorial opinion provide limited practical value to users.
More reliable guidance comes from evidence that reflects how the market actually behaves, including consistent demand signals and shared user experience across large, independent platforms.
This evaluation is built on verifiable signals rather than subjective judgment.
The products highlighted here are not selected because they are favored by editors, but because they repeatedly appear in user searches, discussions, and reviews over time.
All referenced signals are drawn from public, third-party sources, allowing readers to trace, review, and assess the information independently.
Instead of telling users what to choose, this approach presents how real users interact with these products in the market, offering objective context that supports informed, individual decision-making.
Which Disposable Vape Is Right for You in 2026?
Different users prioritize different aspects of disposable vapes.
Based on the parameters above, the following user profiles illustrate how specific device characteristics align with real-world usage needs.
For Beginners and Occasional Users
Users who are new to disposable vapes or use them infrequently tend to benefit from simpler devices with predictable output.
Lower puff ranges, stable draw resistance, and minimal feature complexity help reduce overuse and inconsistency.
Key considerations:
- Moderate puff count
- Stable, non-aggressive output
- Simple single-flavor formats
For Daily Users Seeking Consistency
Daily users often prioritize stability over novelty.
Rechargeable batteries, efficient coil systems, and consistent flavor delivery across the lifespan are more important than headline puff numbers.
Key considerations:
- Rechargeable design
- Proven coil efficiency
- Reliable performance over extended use
For Heavy Users and Long-Term Use
Users with higher daily consumption typically focus on longevity and output stability.
Larger battery capacity and optimized power regulation help maintain consistent vapor delivery throughout extended usage cycles.
Key considerations:
- High typical puff range
- Strong battery capacity
- Output stability under continuous use
For Users Who Value Flavor Variety or New Features
Some users prioritize experience over repetition.
Multi-flavor systems or feature-driven designs appeal to those seeking variety or exploring new form factors.
Key considerations:
- Multi-flavor switching or feature-focused designs
- Balanced output to prevent flavor fatigue
- Flexible usage patterns
Brand & Product Breakdown: Market Data and User Consensus
Elf Bar — Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
Elf Bar is a mass-market disposable vape brand widely recognized for consistent output and standardized product performance. Its best-known models, BC5000 and AF5000, are frequently used by consumers as reference products when comparing other disposable vapes.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: High and stable brand-level and product-level interest extending into 2026 across U.S. and European
- Google Trends: Relative interest consistently remains in the 70–90 range, reflecting high and stable baseline attention across the disposable vape category.
- SEMrush: ~90K monthly searches · stable long-term demand
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Predictable flavor delivery and stable performance; often referenced as a comparison benchmark
- Trustpilot: 4.0 / 5 rating · 55 reviews
Key Takeaway
Elf Bar serves as a market baseline for disposable vapes. Sustained demand and large-scale user feedback make it a common point of comparison for users evaluating alternatives in 2026.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.4 / 5
Geek Bar — Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
Geek Bar is known for high-puff disposable vapes with a focus on output consistency and airflow control. Its Pulse series is frequently discussed in the context of balancing higher puff counts with usable performance.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Product-level interest continues to rise into 2026, driven mainly by newer high-puff models
- Google Trends: Relative interest commonly sits between 55–75, with a clear upward trend driven by increased searches for high-puff Pulse series models.
- SEMrush: ~75K monthly searches · sustained growth driven by Pulse-series queries
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Airflow control and vapor output are repeatedly cited; users often discuss whether high puff counts remain consistent over time
- Trustpilot: No meaningful volume of brand-level reviews available at the time of analysis.
Key Takeaway
Geek Bar attracts users who prioritize higher puff capacity with relatively stable output. Market data and repeated user discussions show it as a common option to try for those evaluating high-capacity disposables in 2026.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.4 / 5
Vapsolo — Multi-Flavor Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
Vapsolo is a disposable vape brand best known for its multi-flavor device architecture, designed to address flavor fatigue during long-term use.
Its most recognized product lines include Quads, Triple, and Twins, all built around flavor rotation rather than single-flavor consumption.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Steady brand- and product-level growth into 2026, strongest in Europe
- Google Trends: Relative interest typically ranges between 45–65, showing a gradual upward trend with no sharp declines, indicating strengthening brand awareness heading into 2026.
- SEMrush: ~60K monthly searches · +23% YoY growth
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Multi-flavor design reduces flavor fatigue; taste remains stable for long-term use
- Trustpilot: 3.8 / 5 rating · 352 reviews
Key Takeaway
Rising demand and consistent user feedback indicate growing adoption in U.S. and European. Multi-flavor rotation and stable taste make this series a practical option to try in 2026.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.3 / 5
Lost Mary — Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
Lost Mary is a flavor-driven disposable vape brand closely associated with Elf Bar. Its designs and formulations are often discussed in direct comparison with mainstream disposables, with emphasis on flavor profile and smoothness.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Stable brand- and product-level interest extending into 2026, frequently searched alongside Elf Bar models
- Google Trends: Relative interest typically falls in the 40–55 range and remains stable over time, with periodic peaks linked to brand comparison searches.
- SEMrush: ~70K monthly searches · steady demand with strong product-level intent
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Users frequently compare flavor smoothness and intensity against similar disposables, with repeat mentions of consistent taste delivery
- Trustpilot: 3.9 / 5 rating · 75 reviews
Key Takeaway
Lost Mary is commonly chosen by users who prioritize flavor smoothness and consistency. Search behavior and recurring user discussions position it as a frequent alternative when comparing mainstream disposable vapes in 2026.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.3 / 5
VOZOL — Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
VOZOL is a disposable vape brand known for design-led devices paired with high-flavor intensity. Its product lines are frequently discussed for visual differentiation and strong flavor delivery rather than feature complexity.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Product-level interest shows a clear upward trajectory heading into 2026, driven by Gear and Neon series searches
- Google Trends: Relative interest generally stays within the 35–55 range, showing a steady upward movement that reflects growing curiosity and trial interest.
- SEMrush: ~65K monthly searches · positive growth trend year-over-year
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Users frequently mention bold flavor intensity and distinctive device appearance; discussions often focus on flavor strength versus long-term balance
- Trustpilot: No meaningful volume of brand-level reviews available at the time of analysis.
Key Takeaway
VOZOL shows growing search interest and active community discussion, particularly around flavor intensity and design. Limited third-party review data suggests the brand is still in a trial and discovery phase, making it a curiosity-driven option rather than a consensus choice in 2026.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.0 / 5
JNR — High-Capacity Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
JNR focuses on high-capacity disposable vapes designed for extended use. Its Falcon series is frequently discussed around puff longevity and output stability rather than flavor variety or advanced customization.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Brand- and product-level interest continues to rise into 2026, driven by high-capacity model searches
- Google Trends: Relative interest mostly ranges between 30–50, with a consistent upward trend from a lower base, indicating emerging attention toward high-capacity disposables.
- SEMrush: ~55K monthly searches · positive year-over-year growth
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Users frequently question whether very high puff counts remain stable over time; repeated discussion around battery performance and draw consistency
- Trustpilot: 3.7 / 5 rating · 20 reviews
Key Takeaway
JNR shows growing search momentum among users prioritizing extended usage cycles and high puff capacity. Community discussion is active, while limited review volume suggests user consensus is still forming.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.2 / 5
Raz — High-Puff Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
Raz is a disposable vape brand known for higher puff count models that compete on extended usage performance and strong flavor profiles more than feature complexity. Its TN9000 series is a frequent topic in high-puff discussions.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Brand- and product-level interest continues to rise into 2026, especially for high-puff models
- Google Trends: Relative interest generally in the mid range (≈35–55) with sustained attention
- SEMrush: Estimated monthly searches in the 40K–60K range, showing ongoing interest without sharp fluctuations
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Community feedback frequently discusses whether high puff counts deliver consistent vapor and flavor over time, with repeat mentions of strong throat hit and intensity
- Trustpilot: No meaningful volume of brand-level reviews available at the time of analysis.
Key Takeaway
Raz is often considered by users who emphasize extended puff capacity and strong performance. Stable search demand and recurring Reddit discussion signal growing trial interest, though broader consensus remains emergent due to limited third-party reviews.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.2 / 5
SKE Crystal — Compact Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
SKE Crystal is a disposable vape line recognized for compact form factors and straightforward usage. Discussion centers on draw feel and day-to-day consistency rather than advanced features.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Brand- and product-level interest remains stable heading into 2026
- Google Trends: Relative interest typically sits in the mid range (≈35–55) with no sharp declines
- SEMrush: Estimated monthly searches in the 20K–40K range, showing steady demand without short-term spikes
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Frequent mentions of smooth draw and simple handling; limited emphasis on customization
- Trustpilot: No meaningful volume of brand-level reviews available at the time of analysis.
Key Takeaway
SKE Crystal appeals to users seeking simplicity and consistent draw. Stable search behavior and recurring community feedback indicate it remains a practical, no-frills option to consider in 2026.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.2 / 5
ZOVOO — Consistent-Performance Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
ZOVOO is a disposable vape brand best known for its Dragbar series, focusing on consistent output and standardized user experience rather than aggressive feature innovation. The brand is often discussed in connection with reliability and predictable performance.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Brand- and product-level interest remains stable heading into 2026, with no sharp volatility
- Google Trends: Relative interest generally stays in the mid range (≈40–60), indicating steady long-term attention
- SEMrush: Estimated monthly searches in the 30K–50K range, reflecting consistent demand without short-term spikes
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Users frequently mention consistent output and predictable draw; discussions focus more on reliability than novelty
- Trustpilot: No meaningful volume of brand-level reviews available at the time of analysis.
Key Takeaway
ZOVOO is commonly chosen by users who value predictability and consistency. Stable search signals and recurring user discussion suggest it remains a dependable option to consider in 2026 rather than a trend-driven choice.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 3.9 / 5
OXBAR — High-Capacity Disposable Vape Series
Brand Overview
OXBAR is a disposable vape brand positioned around high-capacity devices with stable output, focusing on long usage cycles rather than complex feature sets. Its products are often discussed in the context of endurance and consistency.
Key Products
Where This Brand Is Gaining Attention
- Search trend: Brand- and product-level interest shows steady growth heading into 2026, driven mainly by high-capacity models
- Google Trends: Relative interest typically in the mid range (≈40–60) with stable long-term attention
- SEMrush: Estimated monthly searches in the 25K–45K range, showing consistent demand without sharp volatility
What Users Consistently Say
- Reddit: Discussions frequently focus on battery endurance and whether flavor output remains consistent through extended use
- Trustpilot: No meaningful volume of brand-level reviews available at the time of analysis.
Key Takeaway
OXBAR attracts users prioritizing long usage cycles and stable performance. Search trends and recurring community discussion suggest growing trial interest, while limited third-party reviews indicate broader user consensus is still forming in 2026.
Overall Rating (Market-Based): ⭐ 4.0 / 5
Why This List Can Be Trusted for Choosing a Disposable Vape in 2026
This list is built on verifiable market behavior, not subjective preference or brand promotion.
Every product included appears repeatedly across search demand data, user discussion patterns, and long-term usage feedback.
That overlap is what makes these options credible.
Market Demand Confirms Real Interest
Products in this list show sustained search activity over time, which indicates that users are actively researching and comparing them — not just encountering them through marketing.
Consistent demand signals suggest that these products remain relevant beyond short-term trends.
User Consensus Filters Out Noise
Individual reviews can be misleading.
What matters is repetition.
Across large-scale discussion platforms and independent review sites, the same strengths and limitations appear again and again.
This consistency is a strong indicator of real-world performance, not isolated experience.
Product Strengths Align With How People Actually Vape
Disposable vapes are chosen for different reasons: flavor consistency, longer usage cycles, simplicity, or predictability.
The products highlighted here are not included because they claim to do everything, but because users repeatedly select them for specific, practical reasons.
Why This Matters for Your Decision
When search demand, user consensus, and product-level behavior point in the same direction, the risk of a misleading recommendation is significantly reduced.
That convergence is why these products are worth consideration — and why this list reflects how the market truly decides, not how editors speculate.
The final choice remains personal, but the evidence behind these options is not.
About the Author
This article is prepared by the Vapsolo Editorial & Market Research Team, responsible for data-driven analysis and reporting on disposable vape trends across U.S. and European markets.
The team focuses on evaluating publicly observable market signals, usage patterns, and product characteristics, operating independently from commercial and sales activities.
Disclosure: Vapsolo is a manufacturer and brand included in this comparison. All brands are evaluated using the same criteria, based on aggregated market data and user behavior rather than brand affiliation.
For editorial inquiries or data clarification: editorial@vapsolo.com
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The actual number of puffs a disposable vape delivers often differs from advertised maximum figures.
Real-world puff count depends on draw length, power regulation, and battery efficiency.
Most users experience a consistent performance range rather than the headline maximum, especially during extended daily use.
Not necessarily.
While higher puff counts suggest longer usage, value is more closely tied to output stability, battery performance, and flavor retention.
A device with moderate puff capacity but consistent delivery often provides a better experience than one with a higher advertised number but unstable output.
Not necessarily.
While higher puff counts suggest longer usage, value is more closely tied to output stability, battery performance, and flavor retention.
A device with moderate puff capacity but consistent delivery often provides a better experience than one with a higher advertised number but unstable output.
Rechargeable disposable vapes tend to offer more consistent performance over time.
Recharging helps maintain stable power output as e-liquid levels decrease, reducing flavor fade and vapor inconsistency.
However, overall stability still depends on coil efficiency and power management design.
Beginners generally benefit from disposable vapes with moderate puff ranges, stable draw resistance, and simple operation.
Devices that prioritize consistency over maximum output help reduce overuse and provide a more predictable experience, especially for new users.
Beyond puff count, factors such as battery capacity, coil design, and power regulation have a greater impact on real-world satisfaction.
These elements determine how consistently a device performs throughout its lifespan, rather than how long it lasts on paper.
